Countering the Damage of Sarcasm in Workplace Communication

Sarcasm offers only two outcomes, and both are negative for relationships. This is not something you want in workplace communication.

At a specific time within my seminar on “The 7 Deadliest Communication Sins,” I take on the topic of sarcasm at work. Firstly, I ask two very important questions about audience members’ experience with regard to this specific issue as it impacts interpersonal communication and workplace communication.

These two questions are:

  • How many of you have a tendency to use sarcasm?
  • How many of you have ever been on the receiving end of a sarcastic comment that was hurtful?

Virtually all members of the audience respond to one or both of these questions. Certainly, this is informal and unscientific research. However, it speaks volumes about the depth of this communication style and its impact.

Sarcasm and the Erosion of Trust

In my leadership and workplace communication seminars, I discuss how damaging sarcastic communication is to relationships.

First of all, sarcasm is a passive-aggressive communication habit. As a result, it undermines trust between individuals and trust is at the core of one’s ability to get things done in organizations.

Sarcasm offers just two outcomes — it either instantly kills the relationship or begins to slowly erode the relationship. However, both of those outcomes are usually unbeknownst to the perpetrator.

There is no positive upside to using sarcasm. It offers only a short-term positive impact for the sarcastic person whose ego may get a boost by putting others down in this manner.

No Humor in the Workplace?

Oftentimes, sarcasm will be couched in the context of humor and “just trying to be funny.” However, that form of humor always comes at the expense of someone else. Similarly, if it gets confronted — which it rarely does — the victim is labeled as someone who “has no sense of humor” or who “can’t take a joke.”

For those reading this that are open to changing this habit to create more positive, trusting relationships with their workplace colleagues, I’ve developed a simple four-step process to communicate in a way that builds relationships based on high levels of trust.

1. Firstly, name a few people.

  • Identify one or more persons (no more than three) with whom you most regularly communicate in this way.
    • For me, it was my wife.

2. After that, own your mistakes.

  • Apologize for past transgressions, letting the person know that you have recently realized this is a problem that might be negatively impacting your relationship.
    • Let them know you want to improve and change this style of communicating.
    • Ask them to give you feedback on an ongoing basis.
    • Commit to remaining open to hearing whenever you do it.

3. Meanwhile, evaluate regularly.

  • The next time it happens, and you know you’ve violated your standards for communication, take a step back and evaluate why you did it.
  • Ask yourself this series of questions:
    • What was your intent behind using that style of communication?
    • What point were you trying to make?
    • In relation to this situation, what do you believe about…
      • the situation?
      • the other person?
      • yourself?
    •  In communicating to make this point and achieve this intent, what is your greatest fear?

4. Revise your future speech pattern.

  • If you were to communicate more directly and say what you needed to say properly so there is no confusion, what you said was more specific, and it supported the person with whom you are communicating in a positive way…
    • what would you say differently?
    • how would you say it differently?
    • what would you ask them for?

Progress, Not Perfection

In conclusion, there is a fine line between joyful teasing between trusted colleagues or life partners, and biting sarcasm that undermines relationships.

The receiver of the communication is always the determinant as to whether it crosses the line. Judgment calls are out of the control of the communicator. However, sometimes it crosses a line and becomes bad workplace communication.

To sum up, I’m no longer willing to give up control of the intended meaning of my message. Are you?

Picture of Skip Weisman

Skip Weisman

Skip Weisman, The Leadership & Workplace Communication Expert, has worked with business leaders and their teams to transform both individual and organizational performance in industries from banks to plumbers since 2001. Skip’s experience helping his clients has shown that the biggest problems in workplaces today can be directly traced to interpersonal communication between people in the work environment. Having spent 20 years in professional baseball management, his first career in which he served as CEO for five different franchises, has given Skip tremendous insights and skills for build high-performing teams.  To help small business leaders create a championship culture with employees performance at the highest levels, Skip recently published this white paper report The Missing Ingredient Necessary to Improve Employee Performance. Download a free copy of this report at The Missing Ingredient Necessary to Improve Employee Performance. During a 20-year career in professional baseball management, Skip served as CEO for five different franchises. That experience gave Skip tremendous insight and skill for building high-performing teams in the workplace and championship cultures.

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

Sociologist Erving Goffman’s research on what he called civil inattention found that the small, wordless adjustments strangers make for each other in shared public space, stepping aside, angling a cart, holding a gap, function as a form of social coordination just as real as speech, even though nothing is ever said.

Sociologist Erving Goffman’s research on what he called civil inattention found that the small, wordless adjustments strangers make for each other in shared public space, stepping aside, angling a cart, holding a gap, function as a form of social coordination just as real as speech, even though nothing is ever said.

Global English Editing

These students already wanted to be calmer and more outgoing, on average: the ones who wanted it more were predicted to finish the term a little further along than the average classmate

These students already wanted to be calmer and more outgoing, on average: the ones who wanted it more were predicted to finish the term a little further along than the average classmate

The Vessel

In 2007, a 107-year-old Australian woman who could no longer type began dictating a blog about surviving two world wars and the Great Depression, and kept posting until two weeks before she died at 108

In 2007, a 107-year-old Australian woman who could no longer type began dictating a blog about surviving two world wars and the Great Depression, and kept posting until two weeks before she died at 108

The Blog Herald

Psychology says people who drift off mid-task aren’t careless, they’re budgeting: in a preregistered study of 269 adults, those with stronger working memory let attention wander and pulled it back before demand peaked.

Psychology says people who drift off mid-task aren’t careless, they’re budgeting: in a preregistered study of 269 adults, those with stronger working memory let attention wander and pulled it back before demand peaked.

The Vessel

Psychology says parents who hand over a screen to keep the peace aren’t lazy, they’re depleted: across 822 U.S. caregivers of four to eight-year-olds, distress tracked with fewer enforced screen limits.

Psychology says parents who hand over a screen to keep the peace aren’t lazy, they’re depleted: across 822 U.S. caregivers of four to eight-year-olds, distress tracked with fewer enforced screen limits.

The Vessel

We tend to think a good night’s sleep improves memory across the board, but a 2025 Nature Human Behaviour study suggests it works more narrowly, protecting the sequence of events while the finer details fade.

We tend to think a good night’s sleep improves memory across the board, but a 2025 Nature Human Behaviour study suggests it works more narrowly, protecting the sequence of events while the finer details fade.

The Vessel