How Being Paranoid Can Make You 100% Confident

Would you like to be able to walk into any interview or important meeting and be 100% confident? If you answered “YES” to that question, this article is written for you…

As a senior in college, I interviewed for a job opening with a Fortune 100 company. At the time, they were the only employer who had actually asked to interview me.

Naturally, I was insecure about this and very worried they might ask who else had expressed interest in me. However, rather than address this fear before the interview, I simply hoped the question would not come up.

Guess what one of the first questions they asked me was!

I tried to create an answer on the spot. When they probed a little further, I got very flustered and ended up sounding like I was trying to lie. After blowing that question, my confidence evaporated. The rest of the interview just went downhill.

Let’s be honest. Everyone has insecurities. You do. I do. Even celebrities do. Why ignore them or pretend they don’t exist?

Before any job interview or important meeting, ask yourself, “What do I hope I’m not asked in this meeting?”

Then, prepare your answer to that question and practice it out loud until you are comfortable with your reply.

When you are ready to answer that question(s), what is there to be nervous about? You’ll be able to show up with 100% confidence.

I do this all the time…before a big speech, before an important business meeting, even before a big date!

Paranoid? Maybe. Effective? Absolutely.

Try it out, and comment below to let me know how it goes.

Author:

Pete Leibman is the Founder of Dream Job Academy and the Author of the new book titled “I Got My Dream Job and So Can You” (AMACOM, 2012).  His career advice has been featured on Fox, CBS, and CNN, and he is a popular Keynote Speaker at career events for college students and at conferences for people who work with college students.

Picture of Pete Leibman

Pete Leibman

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

Editors who give the most useful feedback rarely start with what’s wrong

Editors who give the most useful feedback rarely start with what’s wrong

Global English Editing

People who reread the same book every few years aren’t stuck in nostalgia, they’re checking in with the version of themselves who read it the first time

People who reread the same book every few years aren’t stuck in nostalgia, they’re checking in with the version of themselves who read it the first time

The Blog Herald

The readers bringing back slow, immersive reading aren’t rejecting technology — they’re often the ones who quietly burned out on skimming everything

The readers bringing back slow, immersive reading aren’t rejecting technology — they’re often the ones who quietly burned out on skimming everything

Global English Editing

Self-publishing produced roughly one hundred thousand ebooks a month before ChatGPT and more than three hundred thousand a month by late 2025, and Amazon has responded with upload caps and identity checks rather than checking any book’s content

Self-publishing produced roughly one hundred thousand ebooks a month before ChatGPT and more than three hundred thousand a month by late 2025, and Amazon has responded with upload caps and identity checks rather than checking any book’s content

The Blog Herald

Writers who can’t let a piece go the moment it’s good enough to show someone aren’t perfectionists, they’re holding onto the last place the work still belongs only to them

Writers who can’t let a piece go the moment it’s good enough to show someone aren’t perfectionists, they’re holding onto the last place the work still belongs only to them

The Blog Herald

Three of this year’s biggest AI-authorship scandals have hit a literary prize, a publisher, and a newspaper — and together they keep exposing how blurry the line around ‘authorship’ has become

Three of this year’s biggest AI-authorship scandals have hit a literary prize, a publisher, and a newspaper — and together they keep exposing how blurry the line around ‘authorship’ has become

Global English Editing