Using Your Personal Brand Name to Brand Products or a Company

I’ve been thinking about how we brand ourselves, in combination with a product or company for a while now. Geoff Livingston and Ari Herzog both sent me notes to inspire today’s post. Many times, you will see authors (such as David Allen), speakers (Tom Peters and Anthony Robbins) and consultants use their personal brand name for their company’s, while many web-based startup companies will use a distinct name for what they are selling, leaving their founder and CEO seperated from their core brand strategy.  There are pros and cons to each approach, so that will be the focus today conversation.

Paul Newman’s legacy

Paul Newman, for any of you who don’t know, was an Academy Award-winning and seven-time Academy Award-nominated actor, film director, entrepreneur, humanitarian and auto racing enthusiast.  Among his many achievements and the legacy that he built was “Newman’s Own,” a food company which Newman donated all post-tax profits and royalties to charity.

Paul died on September 26th this year, yet “Newman’s Own” lives on or does it?  Without Paul’s smile on your salad dressing, would you still purchase it and pay the premium price?  If the bottle just said “Light Balsamic Vinaigrette” would you buy it?  I would say you wouldn’t.  People purchased Newman’s Own because of Paul Newman’s brand and what he represents (philanthropy, success, etc).

My prediction is that they will discontinue this company and line of products after a few years, when the new generation becomes the majority buyer of salad dressing and the name “Newman” is irrelevant to them.  In this situation the company and products die with the personal brand.

The pros and cons of using your name

  • Pros:  When you use your name on your products and company, there is much more visiblity for your brand name.  People are going to remember you more if wherever they go, they see your name.  You can build the company history and story based on a person.  A person is easier to acknowledge then a corporate brand name because you can reach out and touch it.
  • Cons:  It’s much harder to build a larger company around one person’s name, not just because their brand dies when they die, but also because there are more people in the company.  If you use your name it might be seen as selfish, especially if you hire other people that will have the badge “your name, title, your CEO’s name.”  The biggest brands in the world aren’t using their founders name. For example, Apple, GE and IBM.
Recommendations
  • 1)  What is your main business objective.  Are you trying to be a solotrepreneur or do you want to build a business, hiring people along the way?  If in the foreseable future you want to have a thousand emloyees, you might want to use a creative name instead of your own.
  • 2)  Choose a career path before you put your brand on anything.  Do you want to start a company, work for a company or go back to school?  The entrepreneur path is typically the one that makes sense for branding yourself as your company.
  • 3)  Do you want to pass your business down to your family?  A business with your name can be passed down to your child if they accept it or run by someone else in your family.
  • 4)  For legal reasons, if you use your name as your companies name and your company get’s sued, you go down with it.

I’m leaving this conversation open, so if you have any ideas, suggestions or experiences to share, be my guest.

Picture of Dan Schawbel

Dan Schawbel

Dan Schawbel is the Managing Partner of Millennial Branding, a Gen Y research and consulting firm. He is the New York Times and Wall Street Journal bestselling author of Promote Yourself: The New Rules For Career Success (St. Martin’s Press) and the #1 international bestselling book, Me 2.0: 4 Steps to Building Your Future (Kaplan Publishing), which combined have been translated into 15 languages.

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

Some people don’t find their writing voice until their 60s — and for many it turns out the decades weren’t wasted, they were just research

Some people don’t find their writing voice until their 60s — and for many it turns out the decades weren’t wasted, they were just research

The Blog Herald

A lot of people raised in the 1960s and 70s never heard the adults in their lives say they were proud of them — and some quietly spent the next fifty years trying to earn what was already true

A lot of people raised in the 1960s and 70s never heard the adults in their lives say they were proud of them — and some quietly spent the next fifty years trying to earn what was already true

Global English Editing

Fold a single dollar bill in half fifty-one times, not fifty, and the stack would be thick enough to pass the Sun — exponential growth breaks intuition long before it breaks arithmetic

Fold a single dollar bill in half fifty-one times, not fifty, and the stack would be thick enough to pass the Sun — exponential growth breaks intuition long before it breaks arithmetic

The Blog Herald

Sleep science says the pilot who nodded off for 28 minutes at cruising altitude wasn’t being careless — he was legally “rested” by every rule on the books, and fell asleep anyway, because duty-time regulations count hours off, not hours actually spent recovering

Sleep science says the pilot who nodded off for 28 minutes at cruising altitude wasn’t being careless — he was legally “rested” by every rule on the books, and fell asleep anyway, because duty-time regulations count hours off, not hours actually spent recovering

The Blog Herald

Fewer than 2 percent of conversations in a lab ended at the moment both people were ready to stop, and neither had much idea when the other wanted to go

Fewer than 2 percent of conversations in a lab ended at the moment both people were ready to stop, and neither had much idea when the other wanted to go

The Vessel

In the original precrastination experiments, people picked up whichever bucket was closer and carried it the rest of the way — even when it meant carrying more total weight for longer — just to stop holding the choice open

In the original precrastination experiments, people picked up whichever bucket was closer and carried it the rest of the way — even when it meant carrying more total weight for longer — just to stop holding the choice open

Global English Editing