Mixed Messages Cause Confusion & Drama in Many Workplaces

  • 1 min read

“There is no confusion, I was quite clear!”

So proclaimed my client in a conversation last summer as I was helping evaluate the under-performance of an employee recently transferred to a new role.

My client made this claim when I brought to his attention that his employee told me he was confused by what was expected of him in this new role.

Last week, with another client, I learned that a new supervisor who has been having conflicts with her direct reports has been evaluating work at a much higher standard than her predecessor.

It seems there was little conversation about the change in standards and expectations when the change in managers occurred.

Last week when I was delivering a seminar there was a collective groan accompanied by head nods from the 30 business professionals in the audience when I asked if anyone has experienced “mixed messages” from leadership in their workplace.

Communication is blamed for most workplace ills.

Yet, that “communication” issue is rarely defined in a way it can be effectively addressed. For that reason it doesn’t get addressed, causing the same issues to continue manifesting in the workplace to varying degrees.

Organizational leaders need to do nothing more than ask employees for specific examples of mixed messages in their work environment.

Upon first inquiry there may not be much of a response because employees will be uncertain as to how to identify these mixed messages, even though they are experiencing them daily.

But, in inquiring into mixed messages in the workplace, organizational leaders must ask for the inquiry to be on-going and request employees to begin identifying a “mixed-message” whenever and wherever something comes to their attention.

Depending on the organization’s culture these mixed messages by leaders in the workplace may be hard to uncover.

Employees may be leery bringing these perceived mixed messages to the attention of superiors for fear of retribution. Additionally, there may be other issues causing low trust in the workplace that cause people to hold back.

Therefore, leaders must project an openness to hearing examples of mixed messages, even if they are the culprit, and continue to ask for more examples to be brought to their attention.

Over time, two things will result from this approach:

  1. A tremendous amount will be learned about the leaders’ own communication style, as well as the communication throughout the organization.
  2. A significantly higher level of trust will develop in the workplace that will increase performance across all levels of the organization.

Those are two outcomes all organizations should be investing in.

Picture of Skip Weisman

Skip Weisman

Skip Weisman, The Leadership & Workplace Communication Expert, has worked with business leaders and their teams to transform both individual and organizational performance in industries from banks to plumbers since 2001. Skip’s experience helping his clients has shown that the biggest problems in workplaces today can be directly traced to interpersonal communication between people in the work environment. Having spent 20 years in professional baseball management, his first career in which he served as CEO for five different franchises, has given Skip tremendous insights and skills for build high-performing teams.  To help small business leaders create a championship culture with employees performance at the highest levels, Skip recently published this white paper report The Missing Ingredient Necessary to Improve Employee Performance. Download a free copy of this report at The Missing Ingredient Necessary to Improve Employee Performance. During a 20-year career in professional baseball management, Skip served as CEO for five different franchises. That experience gave Skip tremendous insight and skill for building high-performing teams in the workplace and championship cultures.

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

Greif and Gleason’s 1980 research on how children learn politeness routines found that young children almost never say “please” or “thank you” spontaneously, they say it because a parent prompts them with “what do you say?” dozens of times a week, meaning the reflex adults later display without thinking twice was built through years of someone else’s prompting long before it became automatic.

Greif and Gleason’s 1980 research on how children learn politeness routines found that young children almost never say “please” or “thank you” spontaneously, they say it because a parent prompts them with “what do you say?” dozens of times a week, meaning the reflex adults later display without thinking twice was built through years of someone else’s prompting long before it became automatic.

Global English Editing
Still Performing for Ghosts: On the Masks We Keep Wearing for Tribes That No Longer Exist

Still Performing for Ghosts: On the Masks We Keep Wearing for Tribes That No Longer Exist

The Vessel
AI answer boxes are reportedly wiping out a majority of organic search traffic for some blog categories in 2026 — while others have barely lost a visitor, and the split comes down to one thing

AI answer boxes are reportedly wiping out a majority of organic search traffic for some blog categories in 2026 — while others have barely lost a visitor, and the split comes down to one thing

The Blog Herald
Many adult children remember watching a father work sixty-hour weeks for decades so the family could have what he never did, then watched him die in his sixties without ever prioritizing his own happiness, and now see that same pattern quietly repeating in their own lives, under a different name.

Many adult children remember watching a father work sixty-hour weeks for decades so the family could have what he never did, then watched him die in his sixties without ever prioritizing his own happiness, and now see that same pattern quietly repeating in their own lives, under a different name.

Global English Editing
Eye tracking research on how people actually read web pages found that most visitors scan in a rough F shaped pattern down the left side of the screen, which is why professional editors front load the real information instead of slowly building up to it

Eye tracking research on how people actually read web pages found that most visitors scan in a rough F shaped pattern down the left side of the screen, which is why professional editors front load the real information instead of slowly building up to it

The Blog Herald
Harvard researchers had 166 undergraduates rate their own pets on qualities like thoughtful, considerate and sympathetic, and the students who felt most chronically disconnected from other people scored their pets meaningfully higher on exactly those three traits, and no others.

Harvard researchers had 166 undergraduates rate their own pets on qualities like thoughtful, considerate and sympathetic, and the students who felt most chronically disconnected from other people scored their pets meaningfully higher on exactly those three traits, and no others.

Global English Editing
Load more
CATEGORIES
Explore