7 Hits and Misses of LinkedIn’s Fancy New inMaps

LinkedIn’s new inMaps gives you a cool snapshot of your entire LinkedIn network, but is it useful?

In the official announcement of inMaps, LinkedIn asks “Wouldn’t it be great if you could see the way all your connections are related to each other?” Well yes, it would. inMaps is a good start, but it has a long way to go before most people will see the usefulness of coming back to it more than once.

What are LinkedIn inMaps?

A pretty visualization of every connection in your LinkedIn network. Each connection appears as a dot or “node” in the graph, with links between the people that are connected to each other.

Here’s what my inMap currently looks like:

7 hits and misses in this first version of inMaps

HIT: inMaps look great, almost as if they were painted onto your screen. If you want to draw in the eye, give it eye candy, and that works well here.

MISS: although very pretty, inMaps are too hands-off. Aside from some unexplained color choices, node sizes and links, it’s up to you to figure out what it all means. Why not tell us how the colors were assigned, or why one node is larger than another? Simple is good, but too simple isn’t.

HIT: The “big picture” view. One quick glance at the cloud of balls and strings gives you (some) instant insight into your network. Is it a big jumble, or are there “arms”? If so, try to understand why your network is segmented and where you might need to grow your network.

MISS: There’s no (clear) way to tell the stronger links from the weaker ones. Many people connect on LinkedIn simply because they can, or want to have a higher connection count, but then don’t build those relationships, leaving their connections very weak. It would be valuable to know where are the strongest connections in my network so that if I need someone, I know whom to ask that is likely to get a positive reply.

HIT: ease of use. Your inMap is generated in a few seconds and then all you can do is zoom, label, click or share. Aside from the fact that it clearly looks good, the user interface is very clean and lets you focus (which you’ll need to do, if you want to get much sense out of it).

MISS: take your pick of the features that should have been launched already in making inMaps pretty and powerful. Search? Not there yet. Filtering? Neither. One annoyance for me is that I can make private notes about a contact on their full profile, but I can’t see those notes here when I’m browsing my network.

HIT: The fun discovery aspect means you’ll definitely enjoy clicking around, at least on your first visit, exploring how people are inter-connected in ways you never noticed until now AND seeing which people are NOT yet inter-connected but should be, giving you a nice opportunity to make some win-win introductions.

If you have more than 50 connections, you qualify for an inMap. It only takes a few clicks. Get your own inMap here right now (it will open in a new browser window) then come back and tell us what you think.

Author:

Jacob Share, a job search expert, is the creator of JobMob, one of the biggest blogs in the world about finding jobs. Follow him on Twitter for job search tips and humor.

Picture of Jacob Share

Jacob Share

Jacob Share, a job search expert, is the creator of JobMob, one of the biggest blogs in the world about finding jobs. Follow him on Twitter for job search tips and humor.

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

A Commonwealth Short Story Prize winner was accused of using AI to write his entry, and months into a review, the prize committee still hasn’t said whether that changes the win

A Commonwealth Short Story Prize winner was accused of using AI to write his entry, and months into a review, the prize committee still hasn’t said whether that changes the win

The Blog Herald

Editors who give the most useful feedback rarely start with what’s wrong

Editors who give the most useful feedback rarely start with what’s wrong

Global English Editing

People who reread the same book every few years aren’t stuck in nostalgia, they’re checking in with the version of themselves who read it the first time

People who reread the same book every few years aren’t stuck in nostalgia, they’re checking in with the version of themselves who read it the first time

The Blog Herald

The readers bringing back slow, immersive reading aren’t rejecting technology — they’re often the ones who quietly burned out on skimming everything

The readers bringing back slow, immersive reading aren’t rejecting technology — they’re often the ones who quietly burned out on skimming everything

Global English Editing

Self-publishing produced roughly one hundred thousand ebooks a month before ChatGPT and more than three hundred thousand a month by late 2025, and Amazon has responded with upload caps and identity checks rather than checking any book’s content

Self-publishing produced roughly one hundred thousand ebooks a month before ChatGPT and more than three hundred thousand a month by late 2025, and Amazon has responded with upload caps and identity checks rather than checking any book’s content

The Blog Herald

Writers who can’t let a piece go the moment it’s good enough to show someone aren’t perfectionists, they’re holding onto the last place the work still belongs only to them

Writers who can’t let a piece go the moment it’s good enough to show someone aren’t perfectionists, they’re holding onto the last place the work still belongs only to them

The Blog Herald