How Small Business Leaders Can Use Google’s Teamwork Study

Teamwork Tips

In 2012 Google began studying teamwork in the company. Called “Project Aristotle,” results were released in 2016.

Google in-house researchers studied 180 teams at the company and analyzed over 250 team attributes through more than 200 interviews.

The final results reported five key characteristics that allowed teams to achieve high-levels of success. In order of importance they are:

* Psychological Safety
* Dependability
* Structure and clarity
* Meaning
* Impact

They found these five factors present in how the teams functioned were more important than the individual team members’ capabilities.

Now, I’m assuming the results bringing those five characteristics to the fore assume a certain level of competency.

Most of the articles I’ve read that have summarized the Google teamwork results have stopped with what I posted above just listing the traits and speak little about how to achieve them. Which, if you’ve ever tried, you know is not easy.

This is important because most employees in most small businesses are hired because of their expected competencies in fulfilling the role for which they are hired.

BUT, the things that typically cause the greatest stress in small businesses is not a team member’s competency in how well they do their job. The big issues that arise typically is how those individual employees interact and engage with their co-workers.

Often, teamwork in small business is less formal and more just a basic requirement of the functionality of getting things done in an environment with a limited number of personnel.

And, in working with small businesses the past 15 years to improve communication, collaboration, and teamwork those five characteristics are often the cause of greatest discourse.

Unfortunately, small business leaders are not aware of these factors.

They blame unmotivated employees with bad attitudes for a lack of contributing to the collaborative work environment.

In reality, the cause is a work environment that lacks these five factors.

Four of the characteristics, dependability, structure and clarity, meaning, and impact, are almost self-explanatory and relatively easy to incorporate.

Psychological safety on the other hand, I’ve found to be challenging to find in most work environments.

On Google’s internal “rework” website where the results and recommendations are posted explains psychological safety as:

“an individual’s perception of the consequences of taking an interpersonal risk or a belief that a team is safe for risk taking in the face of being seen as ignorant, incompetent, negative, or disruptive. In a team with high psychological safety, teammates feel safe to take risks around their team members. They feel confident that no one on the team will embarrass or punish anyone else for admitting a mistake, asking a question, or offering a new idea.”
 
This is rarely present.

When it is, a company thrives.

The challenge with creating psychological safety is that individual personality traits and levels of self-esteem impact it.

Interestingly, every wants and needs psychological safety to thrive. Without it, human beings would be paralyzed to say or do anything.

Yet, few of us participate in helping to create it. Most of our behavior tends to undermine it.

You’ve probably experienced situations where people are publicly judged for their opinions and ideas, or called out in public without their knowledge or approval when failing to fulfill a promise or deliver on a commitment.

Here are a three ways leaders can foster psychological safety that will lead to higher levels of teamwork and collaboration in your work environment:

  • Have a “psychological safety” conversation with the team and create an understanding of what it is and why it’s important. Then, have the team share ideas for making it part of their team experience, and create and commit to a “Team Agreement.”
  • Instill a commitment to ABC Communication, “always be curious.” If your team commits to always being curious, the first response would be a question seeking to understand instead of showing judgment.
  • Have private check-ins with each team member to ensure they feel they are able to participate at a level their comfortable and encourage additional ideas to make it even better. Then, bring the anonymous collective ideas to the team for discussion and refinements of the “Team Agreement.”

What is your experience with psychological safety in your work environments? What strategies have you incorporated to create it? Leave a comment below and let’s start a conversation.

Picture of Skip Weisman

Skip Weisman

Skip Weisman, The Leadership & Workplace Communication Expert, has worked with business leaders and their teams to transform both individual and organizational performance in industries from banks to plumbers since 2001. Skip’s experience helping his clients has shown that the biggest problems in workplaces today can be directly traced to interpersonal communication between people in the work environment. Having spent 20 years in professional baseball management, his first career in which he served as CEO for five different franchises, has given Skip tremendous insights and skills for build high-performing teams.  To help small business leaders create a championship culture with employees performance at the highest levels, Skip recently published this white paper report The Missing Ingredient Necessary to Improve Employee Performance. Download a free copy of this report at The Missing Ingredient Necessary to Improve Employee Performance. During a 20-year career in professional baseball management, Skip served as CEO for five different franchises. That experience gave Skip tremendous insight and skill for building high-performing teams in the workplace and championship cultures.

TRENDING AROUND THE WEB

If you want to look and feel young in your 60s and beyond, say goodbye to these 5 behaviors

If you want to look and feel young in your 60s and beyond, say goodbye to these 5 behaviors

Baseline

8 signs a woman wants more than friendship with you, according to psychology

8 signs a woman wants more than friendship with you, according to psychology

Global English Editing

From masters to servants: Are we surrendering human potential to AI?

From masters to servants: Are we surrendering human potential to AI?

The Vessel

9 unique benefits of being a highly sensitive person, according to neuroscience

9 unique benefits of being a highly sensitive person, according to neuroscience

Jeanette Brown

9 things in life that don’t actually matter in the long run, according to psychology

9 things in life that don’t actually matter in the long run, according to psychology

Baseline

If you use these 8 phrases often, you’re probably an exceptional conversationalist

If you use these 8 phrases often, you’re probably an exceptional conversationalist

Global English Editing