There has been a lot of talk in the blogosphere about how personal and corporate branding are starting to collide. I’m
not very surprised that people are questioning personal branding as it relates to overshadowing their corporate brand. This was all bound to happen as some point because corporate and personal brands have the same exact features on social networks and are subject to the same rules and scrutiny. Both people, companies and products get the same standard page on social networks like Twitter. Since a corporate brand must interact with it’s audience through people (employees), individuals have to claim, use and monitor their corporate Twitter accounts.
Out of all the social media tools right now, Twitter is not only the hottest one, but the one with the most business uses. For instance, it can be used for customer service, for PR and for lead generation. After much discussion, today I want to analyze how companies are using Twitter and try and figure out how personal and corporate brands can function together on the service.
How corporate and personal brands use Twitter
- Corporate branding: Brands like GoDaddy and Comcast are using Twitter as a customer service vehicle. When customers are having issues with their service, they just use the “@” sign and the corporate Twitter handle to complain, which is answered by a person behind those accounts. This is a good system for people who hate calling for support, especially if they’re already on Twitter. Then there is Sodexo (and EMC does this too), who promotes their employer brand and offers jobs through Twitter. There are also companies that are using Twitter to just republish or “push” out articles, such as the NY Times and WSJ. There are even some companies that are using accounts just for products or product launches.
- Personal branding: People have many uses for Twitter, depending on who they are, what they’re associated with and their role in society. For instance, Jimmy Fallon uses Twitter to promote his new late night TV show, while MC Hammer uses it to promote Dancejam.com, his dance video site. Then there’s P Diddy, who uses it because he has the biggest ego on this planet and craves the attention. There are those who are looking to promote themselves to become micro-celebrities and others who are either supporting their company, their consulting business or are just plain doing it for fun (social reasons).
4 top examples analyzed
I did a quick scrape of the Twittersphere to find four great examples to show you the mix of personal and corporate brands on Twitter. Please remember that everyone is still experimenting, including me, so this is just something to think about and ponder.
- Scott Monty / Ford – Scott uses his personal brand name as his account for Ford. I know he has other accounts with Ford brand names, but his primary one is his own name. The good thing about this approach is that people in the social media world already know Scott Monty and he’s done an amazing job building a community over the last however amount of years, earning his spot as the ford social media guy. There is a major downside to this approach though that I’ve been thinking about. Since he’s using his name, every time he gets retweeted or someone wants to communicate with him about Ford, his name is being passed on and not his companies. Also, when he leaves Ford (he’s bound to at some point in the future, either to retire or move to a new position or company), his personal brand will transfer, but Ford will lose all that equity he’s built up on his personal Twitter account (# of followers). I’m not saying Scott’s strategy is good or bad, but it’s certainly a good one to discuss. He’s a friend of mine and has paved the way for most of us in this space, so I thank him.
- Frank Eliason / Comcast – Frank is a pretty smart man to be the first person to humanize Comcast and earn insane press mentions and celebrity status for what he’s done on Twitter. He uses the Comcast brand name in association with “cares,” which is smart because people will keep seeing that name and really think Comcast cares (even if they don’t 😉 ). He really brands himself on the Comcast page using his picture (avatar) and bio, along with a custom page with more of his information. The good part about this is that it feels like a real person is helping you when you have problems. The bad part is that the account might not be successful in the future without Frank because people connect with him more than Comcast.
- Jennifer Cisney / Kodak – Jennifer is Kodak’s chief blogger and Twitter’er. She uses the Kodak brand name as a handle and mixes her picture with the Kodak brand name, which is a very unique way of co-branding a Twitter account. The Kodak brand takes priority over Jennifer if you observe her background and profile, which is a good thing. She uses the account to push out press releases, corporate news, her latest blog posts and more. The negative aspect about this approach is that it doesn’t scale and as more and more people blog of Kodak and her role switches, this account won’t make much sense anymore.
- EMC / Dan Schawbel – I didn’t think it was fair to analyze three other brands without scrutinizing my own. I’ve setup, controlled and managed the EMC corporate brand on Twitter, and a few other accounts that I helped start, such as @EMCCareers and @EMCWorld. The brand is 100% EMC corporate branding and has no signs of personal branding. It isn’t a communication vehicle, just like the NYTimes and WSJ and others. The original goal was to push out press releases on Twitter because the media was already on there, as well as other influencers. In the future this may change, but for now, it doesn’t make sense for me to Tweet about EMC products because I don’t have any knowledge in that area. I’d rather remain more anonymous because it’s a 1-way account and doesn’t need a face. The cons are that it will take longer to grow and that it’s seen as “anti-social” in the social media world.
Conclusion
I can’t give you a real solution here because I don’t think anyone has figured how to personal and corporate brands can “play nice” in social media. It really comes back to having goals set for the account before you establish it, build a list of followers and constantly get your name out there. If you’re the corporate Twitter person, leading with the corporate brand name is extremely important, especially because you’re getting paid! If you aren’t the corporate Twitter person in your company, but have an account, then you can do whatever you want, as long as you’re still best representing your company. At the end of the day, we all really need to take a second look at how we’re positioned in relation to our affiliations on social networks in general, not just Twitter.
How are you branded on Twitter?
Get ready for Me 2.0 on April 7th!
With millions of people losing their jobs and college graduates struggling to get entry-level positions, my new book called Me 2.0: Build a Powerful Brand to Achieve Career Success (Kaplan) is the solution to all of your problems. With a proven 4-step process for building a powerful brand, harnessing the power of social media technologies, this book will put you in the drivers seat in your career, help you realize your full potential and achieve your dreams. Me 2.0 has been already written about in the WSJ, Miami Herald, BusinessWeek, Entrepreneur and more. It has been endorsed an incredible 34 times, by the likes of Gary Vaynerchuk, Daniel Pink, Keith Ferrazzi, Marshall Goldsmith, Jay Conrad Levinson, Robert B. Cialdini and more.
If you’re a blogger and would like a sneak peak at this book or a journalist interested in receiving a copy, please email me at dan.schawbel@gmail.com. I hope you all enjoy Me 2.0 and look forward to your feedback.
